EXPLAIN EXTENDED

From Stack Overflow:

I have lots of data with start and stop times for a given ID and I need to flatten all intersecting and adjacent timespans into one combined timespan.

To make things a bit clearer, take a look at the sample data for 03.06.2009:

The following timespans are overlapping or contiunous and need to merge into one timespan:

date	start	stop
2009.06.03	05:54:48:000	10:00:13:000
2009.06.03	09:26:45:000	09:59:40:000

The resulting timespan would be from 05:54:48 to 10:00:13.

Since there's a gap between 10:00:13 and 10:12:50, we also have the following timespans:

date	start	stop
2009.06.03	10:12:50:000	10:27:25:000
2009.06.03	10:13:12:000	11:14:56:000
2009.06.03	10:27:25:000	10:27:31:000
2009.06.03	10:27:39:000	13:53:38:000
2009.06.03	11:14:56:000	11:15:03:000
2009.06.03	11:15:30:000	14:02:14:000
2009.06.03	13:53:38:000	13:53:43:000
2009.06.03	14:02:14:000	14:02:31:000

which result in one merged timespan from 10:12:50 to 14:02:31, since they're overlapping or adjacent.

Any solution, be it SQL or not, is appreciated.

This is also quite a common task.

The algorithm here is simple:

1. Order all timespans by start
2. Initialize a variable which will hold a running maximum of the timespans' stop
3. Take the timespans one by one, and for each next timespan, check its start against a running maximum of the previous stop's. If the current start is greater than the maximum of previous stop's, it means that all timespans that started earlier have been ended, and we have a gap
4. Update the running maximum

Unfortunately, SQL Server does not provide a simple way to calculate running maximums. We could use a correlated subquery of course, but it would take forever.

This is one of quite rare cases when cursor in SQL Server work faster than set-based operations.

Let's create a sample table and see how it works:
Read the rest of this entry »

From Stack Overflow:

I want to combine two tables into one.

Let say I have:

Table1:

ID	Name
1	A
2	B
3	C

Table2:

ID	Name
4	D
5	E
6	F

I want to make Table3:

Name1	Name2
A	D
B	E
C	F

How can I do this in SQL Server?

This a certainly a task for a JOIN, since we have two tables here and want to match any row from the first table with another row from the second table.

But what condition do we use for a JOIN?

The ID's of the rows seem to be arbitrary and have no special meaning. They could as well be sparse and randomly distributed, so it's impossible to build a formula which corresponds one ID to another. Same is true for the names.

However, there actually is a condition which we could JOIN on.

Since the author mentioned there is same number of rows in both tables, we could use the ROW_NUMBER() as a JOIN condition.

We just need to wrap both these queries into CTE's which select a ROW_NUMBER() along with the table data:

WITH    table1 AS
        (
        SELECT  1 AS id, 'A' AS name
        UNION ALL
        SELECT  2 AS id, 'B' AS name
        UNION ALL
        SELECT  3 AS id, 'C' AS name
        ),
        table2 AS
        (
        SELECT  4 AS id, 'D' AS name
        UNION ALL 
        SELECT  5 AS id, 'E' AS name
        UNION ALL
        SELECT  6 AS id, 'F' AS name
        ),
        q1 AS
        (
        SELECT  table1.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY name) AS rn
        FROM    table1
        ),
        q2 AS
        (
        SELECT  table2.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY name) AS rn
        FROM    table2
        )
SELECT  q1.name, q2.name
FROM    q1
JOIN    q2
ON      q2.rn = q1.rn

Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0. 

SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms,  elapsed time = 4 ms. 

In my yesterday's article:

• Latest DISTINCT records

I described an efficient query to select 10 latest distinct IP's from a pagehit table in MySQL.

Here's the query:

SELECT  INET_NTOA(ip), ts
FROM    t_latest2 lo
WHERE   NOT EXISTS (
        SELECT  1
        FROM    t_latest2 li
        WHERE   li.ip = lo.ip
                AND li.ts > lo.ts
        )
ORDER BY
        ts DESC
LIMIT 10

, which works all right if there are lots of distinct IP's (as it is in a real table).

However, due to the bug in MySQL, this query is not as efficient as it should be.

Let's create the sample table and see what the problem is:
Read the rest of this entry »

From Stack Overflow:

I have a table containing pagehit data in MySQL.

How do I grab the 10 latest unique IP's from that table?

This is quite a common task and there are two approaches to solve it.

Let's create two sample tables that differ in IP distribution:
Read the rest of this entry »

This is the fourth and final article of the series on how to strip all strings in a set of their longest common prefix and concatenate the results:

• Longest common prefix: SQL Server
• Longest common prefix: PostgreSQL
• Longest common prefix: Oracle
• Longest common prefix: MySQL

, and today we will solve this task for MySQL.

A quick reminder of the problem (taken from Stack Overflow):

I have some data:

id	ref
1	3536757616
1	3536757617
1	3536757618
2	3536757628
2	3536757629
2	3536757630

and want to get the result like this:

id	result
1	3536757616/7/8
2	3536757629/28/30

Essentially, the data should be aggregated on id, and the ref's should be concatenated together and separated by a / (slash), but with longest common prefix removed.

MySQL solution differs from the previous ones a little.

On the one hand, MySQL is the only RDBMS of all listed above that supplies a built-in GROUP_CONCAT (aggregate function to concatenate strings).

On the other hand, MySQL lacks a way to generate an arbitrary resultset which we relied upon in all solutions above.

This makes it easier to concatenate the results, but a lot harder to find the longest common prefix.

Fortunately, there is a way to do it.

Since 5.1, MySQL offers an XPath manipulation function, namely ExtractValue, that will help us to solve this task.

Unfortunately, ExtractValue is not set generating, i. e. it cannot create an SQL resultset out of an XML nodeset. But XPath itself is quite a powerful tool, and we can implement the longest common prefix algorithm completely in XPath.
Read the rest of this entry »

Today, the third article of the series on how to strip all strings in a set of their longest common prefix and concatenate the results:

• Longest common prefix: SQL Server
• Longest common prefix: PostgreSQL
• Longest common prefix: Oracle
• Longest common prefix: MySQL

This article will describe how to do it in Oracle.

A quick reminder of the problem (taken from Stack Overflow):

I have some data:

id	ref
1	3536757616
1	3536757617
1	3536757618
2	3536757628
2	3536757629
2	3536757630

and want to get the result like this:

id	result
1	3536757616/7/8
2	3536757629/28/30

Essentially, the data should be aggregated on id, and the ref's should be concatenated together and separated by a / (slash), but with longest common prefix removed.

As I already wrote earlier, this solution needs two aggregates: first one to calculate the length of the longest common prefix and the second one to concatenate the strings.

Oracle allows creating custom aggregates, but it's usually a pain to implement them. That's why we will use Oracle's MODEL clause to solve this task.
Read the rest of this entry »

This is a series of articles on how to strip all strings in a set of their longest common prefix and concatenate the results:

• Longest common prefix: SQL Server
• Longest common prefix: PostgreSQL
• Longest common prefix: Oracle
• Longest common prefix: MySQL

Today, I'll show how to do it in PostgreSQL.

A quick reminder of the problem (taken from Stack Overflow):

I have some data:

id	ref
1	3536757616
1	3536757617
1	3536757618
2	3536757628
2	3536757629
2	3536757630

and want to get the result like this:

id	result
1	3536757616/7/8
2	3536757629/28/30

Essentially, the data should be aggregated on id, and the ref's should be concatenated together and separated by a / (slash), but with longest common prefix removed.

Like with SQL Server, it is possible to do this in PostgreSQL using a single SQL query.

But since PostgreSQL offers a nice ability to create custom aggregates, I'll better demonstrate how to solve this task using ones.

In my opinion, custom aggregates fit here just perfectly.

Since PostgreSQL lacks native support for aggregate concatenation, we will need to create two custom aggregates here:
Read the rest of this entry »

From Stack Overflow:

I have some data:

id	ref
1	3536757616
1	3536757617
1	3536757618
2	3536757628
2	3536757629
2	3536757630

and want to get the result like this:

id	result
1	3536757616/7/8
2	3536757629/28/30

Essentially, the data should be aggregated on id, and the ref's should be concatenated together and separated by a / (slash), but with longest common prefix removed.

I've already encoutered this problem several times, so I'll try to cover solutions for all RDBMS's my blog is about:

• Longest common prefix: SQL Server
• Longest common prefix: PostgreSQL
• Longest common prefix: Oracle
• Longest common prefix: MySQL

I hope this will be interesting as approaches will differ significantly for all four systems.

Today is SQL Server time.

I won't create sample tables here, since I'm demonstrating the principle. Instead, I'll just use dynamically generated data.

What do we need to do here is:

1. Find least common prefix for each group and its length
2. Cut off the prefix of each but the first ref, using SUBSTRING
3. Concatenate the strings using FOR XML

Steps 2 and 3 are quite simple, but the first one needs some effort.

SQL Server doesn't provide a function to find the longest common prefix (LCP), so we'll have to implement it.

With some limitations, it may be done using pure SQL, no UDF's.
Read the rest of this entry »

From Stack Overflow:

I need to select 3 columns from a table, but I need each value from any column to be unique in the resultset for this column.

This query:

SELECT DISTINCT TOP 10 a, b, c
FROM   x

will return 10 distinct sets.

How do I do it?

Here we will need to make sure that for each column in a record we are going to return, no previous record returned so far does not contain the same value of the column.

Let's create a sample table and construct the query:
Read the rest of this entry »

From Stack Overflow:

I have this query:

SELECT  DISTINCT id, name
FROM    table1

For a given id, the name will always be the same.

Both fields are indexed. There's no separate table that maps the id to the name.

The table is very large (10,000,000 rows), so the query could take some time.

This query is very fast, since it's indexed:

SELECT  DISTINCT id
FROM    table1

Likewise for this query:

SELECT  DISTINCT id
FROM    table1

Assuming I can't get the database structure changed (a very safe assumption), what's a better way to structure the first query for performance?

The fastest way would of course be building an index on (id, name).

But since we (for whatever reason) cannot change the database structure, it's not an option.

Author, nevertheless, mentioned that for any given id, the name will always be the same. This can help us.

Let's create a sample table:
Read the rest of this entry »